Noetherian ring: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
==Definition==
==Definition==


===Symbol-free definition===
Below are some '''equivalent''' definitions of Noetherian ring:


A [[commutative unital ring]] is termed Noetherian if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! No. !! Shorthand !! A [[commutative unital ring]] is termed Noetherian if ... !! A [[commutative unital ring]] <math>R</math> is termed Noetherian if ...
|-
| 1 || [[ascending chain condition]] on ideals || any ascending chain of ideals stabilizes after a finite length || '''arbitrary version''': if <math>J</math> is a well-ordered set and <math>I_j, j \in J</math> are ideals such that <math>I_j \subseteq I_k</math> for <math>j \le k</math>, there exists some <math>j \in J</math> such that <math>I_j = I_k</math> for all <math>k \ge j</math>.<br>'''countable chain version''': If <math>I_1 \subseteq I_2 \subseteq \dots </math> is an ascending chain of ideals, then there exists <math>I_n</math> such that <math>I_n = I_m</math> for all <math>m \ge n</math>.
|-
| 2 || finite generation of ideals || every [[ideal]] in the ring is [[defining ingredient::finitely generated ideal|finitely generated]]. || for every ideal <math>I</math> in <math>R</math>, there exist elements <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n \in I</math> such that <math>I</math> is the ideal generated by <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>.
|-
| 3 || finite generation of prime ideals || every [[defining ingredient::prime ideal]] in the ring is [[finitely generated ideal|finitely generated]]. || for every prime ideal <math>P</math> in <math>R</math>, there exist elements <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n \in P</math> such that <math>P</math> equals the ideal generated by <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>.
|}


* [[Ascending chain condition]] on ideals: Any ascending chain of ideals stabilizes after a finite length.
===Equivalence of definitions===
* Every [[ideal]] in the ring is [[defining ingredient::finitely generated ideal|finitely generated]].
* Every [[prime ideal]] in the ring is finitely generated.


===Definition with symbols===
{{further|[[equivalence of definitions of Noetherian ring]]}}


A [[commutative unital ring]] <math>R</math> is termed a '''Noetherian ring''' if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:
==Metaproperties==


* If <math>J</math> is a well-ordered set and <math>I_j, j \in J</math> are ideals such that <math>I_j \subseteq I_k</math> for <math>j \le k</math>, there exists some <math>j \in J</math> such that <math>I_j = I_k</math> for all <math>k \ge j</math>.
{| class="sortable" border="1"
* If <math>I_1 \subseteq I_2 \subseteq \dots </math> is an ascending chain of ideals, then there exists <math>I_n</math> such that <math>I_N = I_m</math> for all <math>m \ge n</math>.
! Metaproperty name !! Satisfied? !! Proof !! Statement with symbols
* For every ideal <math>I</math> in <math>R</math>, there exist elements <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n \in I</math> such that <math>I</math> is the ideal generated by <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>.
|-
* For every prime ideal <math>P</math> in <math>R</math>, there exist elements <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n \in P</math> such that <math>P</math> equals the ideal generated by <math>x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n</math>.
| [[satisfies metaproperty::polynomial-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || Yes || [[Noetherianness is polynomial-closed]] || Suppose <math>R</math> is a Noetherian ring. Then, the [[polynomial ring]] <math>R[x]</matH> is also a Noetherian ring.
|-
| [[satisfies metaproperty::quotient-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || Yes || [[Noetherianness is quotient-closed]] || Suppose <math>R</math> is a Noetherian ring and <math>I</math> is an [[ideal]] in <math>R</math>. Then, the [[quotient ring]] <math>R/I</math> is also a Noetherian ring.
|-
| [[dissatisfies metaproperty::subring-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || No || [[Noetherianness is not subring-closed]] || It is possible to have the following: <math>R</math> is a Noetherian ring and <math>S</math> is a (unital) subring of <math>R</math>, but <math>S</math> is not a Noetherian ring. For instance, consider any non-Noetherian [[integral domain]]; this is a subring of a [[field]], which is Noetherian.
|-
| [[satisfies metaproperty::localization-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || Yes || [[Noetherianness is localization-closed]] || Suppose <math>R</math> is a Noetherian ring and <math>S</math> is a multiplicatively closed subset of <math>R</math>. Then, the localization of <math>R</math> at <math>S</math> is also Noetherian.
|-
| [[satisfies metaproperty::finite direct product-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || Yes || [[Noetherianness is finite direct product-closed]] || Suppose <math>R_1, R_2,\dots,R_n</math> are Noetherian rings. Then, the direct product <math>R_1 \times R_2 \times \dots \times R_n</math> is also a Noetherian ring.
|-
| [[satisfies metaproperty::completion-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || Yes || [[Noetherianness is completion-closed]] || Suppose <math>R</matH> is a commutative unital ring and <math>M</math> is a [[maximal ideal]] in <math>R</math>. The completion of <math>R</math> at <math>M</math> is also Noetherian.
|}


==Relation with other properties==
==Relation with other properties==
Line 25: Line 42:
===Conjunction with other properties===
===Conjunction with other properties===


* [[Weaker than::Noetherian domain]] is a Noetherian ring that is also an [[integral domain]].
{| class="sortable" border="1"
* [[Weaker than::Reduced Noetherian ring]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[reduced ring]]: it has no nonzero nilpotent elements.
! Conjunction !! Other component of conjunction !! Additional comments
* [[Weaker than::Noetherian normal domain]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[normal domain]].
|-
* [[Weaker than::Noetherian unique factorization domain]]
| [[Weaker than::Noetherian domain]] || [[integral domain]] ||
* [[Weaker than::Local Noetherian ring]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[local ring]].
|-
* [[Weaker than::Local Noetherian domain]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[local domain]].
| [[Weaker than::reduced Noetherian ring]] || [[reduced ring]]: it has no nonzero nilpotent elements. ||
* [[Weaker than::Zero-dimensional Noetherian ring]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[zero-dimensional ring]]: every [[prime ideal]] in it is a [[maximal ideal]].
|-
* [[Weaker than::One-dimensional Noetherian domain]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[one-dimensional domain]].
| [[Weaker than::Noetherian normal domain]] || [[normal domain]] ||
* [[Weaker than::Finite-dimensional Noetherian ring]] is a Noetherian ring that is also a [[finite-dimensional ring]]: its [[Krull dimension]] is finite.
|-
| [[Weaker than::Noetherian unique factorization domain]] || [[unique factorization domain]] ||
|-
| [[Weaker than::local Noetherian ring]]|| [[local ring]] ||
|-
| [[Weaker than::local Noetherian domain]] || [[local domain]] ||
|-
| [[Weaker than::zero-dimensional Noetherian ring]] || [[zero-dimensional ring]]: every [[prime ideal]] in it is a [[maximal ideal]] ||
|-
| [[Weaker than::one-dimensional Noetherian domain]] || [[one-dimensional domain]]: [[integral domain]] in which every nonzero prime ideal is maximal ||
|-
| [[Weaker than::finite-dimensional Noetherian ring]] || [[finite-dimensional ring]]: its [[Krull dimension]] is finite. ||
|}


===Stronger properties===
===Stronger properties===


{| class="wikitable" border="1"
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! property !! quick description !! proof of implication !! proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! intermediate notions  
! Property !! Meaning !! Proof of implication !! Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! Intermediate notions  
|-
|-
| [[Weaker than::Polynomial ring over a field]] || <math>k[x]</math> for a field <math>k</math> || || || {{intermediate notions short|Noetherian ring|polynomial ring over a field}}
| [[Weaker than::Polynomial ring over a field]] || <math>k[x]</math> for a field <math>k</math> || || || {{intermediate notions short|Noetherian ring|polynomial ring over a field}}
Line 55: Line 84:
===Weaker properties===
===Weaker properties===


{| class="wikitable" border="1"
{| class="sortable" border="1"
! property !! quick description !! proof of implication !! proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! intermediate notions  
! Property !! Meaning !! Proof of implication !! Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! Intermediate notions
|-
|-
| [[Stronger than::Coherent ring]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|Coherent ring|Noetherian ring}}
| [[Stronger than::Coherent ring]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|Coherent ring|Noetherian ring}}
|}
|}
==Metaproperties==
{{poly-closed curing property}}
The polynomial ring over a Noetherian ring is again Noetherian. This is a general formulation of the [[Hilbert basis theorem]], which asserts in particular that the [[polynomial ring over a field]] is Noetherian.
{{further|[[Noetherianness is polynomial-closed]]}}
{{Q-closed curing property}}
The [[quotient ring]] of a Noetherian ring by an ideal, is also Noetherian. {{further|[[Noetherianness is quotient-closed]]}}
{{not S-closed curing property}}
A subring of a Noetherian ring is not necessarily Noetherian. For this, consider any non-Noetherian [[integral domain]]; this is a subring of a [[field]], which is Noetherian.
{{localization-closed curing property}}
A localization of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian. Intuitively, when we take localizations, we land up with fewer ideals, so the ascending chain condition becomes easier to satisfy. {{further|[[Noetherianness is localization-closed]]}}
{{finite DP-closed curing property}}
A direct product of finitely many Noetherian rings is again Noetherian. This is essentially because ideals in the direct product look like direct products of ideals in the factors. {{proofat|[[Noetherianness is finite direct product-closed]]}}
{{completion-closed curing property}}
The completion of a Noetherian ring at a [[maximal ideal]] is again a Noetherian ring. {{proofat|[[Noetherianness is completion-closed]]}}

Latest revision as of 03:01, 18 July 2013

This article is about a standard (though not very rudimentary) definition in commutative algebra. The article text may, however, contain more than just the basic definition
View a complete list of semi-basic definitions on this wiki

This article defines a property of commutative unital rings; a property that can be evaluated for a commutative unital ring
View all properties of commutative unital rings
VIEW RELATED: Commutative unital ring property implications | Commutative unital ring property non-implications |Commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | Commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions | Commutative unital ring property satisfactions | Commutative unital ring property dissatisfactions

Definition

Below are some equivalent definitions of Noetherian ring:

No. Shorthand A commutative unital ring is termed Noetherian if ... A commutative unital ring is termed Noetherian if ...
1 ascending chain condition on ideals any ascending chain of ideals stabilizes after a finite length arbitrary version: if is a well-ordered set and are ideals such that for , there exists some such that for all .
countable chain version: If is an ascending chain of ideals, then there exists such that for all .
2 finite generation of ideals every ideal in the ring is finitely generated. for every ideal in , there exist elements such that is the ideal generated by .
3 finite generation of prime ideals every prime ideal in the ring is finitely generated. for every prime ideal in , there exist elements such that equals the ideal generated by .

Equivalence of definitions

Further information: equivalence of definitions of Noetherian ring

Metaproperties

Metaproperty name Satisfied? Proof Statement with symbols
polynomial-closed property of commutative unital rings Yes Noetherianness is polynomial-closed Suppose is a Noetherian ring. Then, the polynomial ring is also a Noetherian ring.
quotient-closed property of commutative unital rings Yes Noetherianness is quotient-closed Suppose is a Noetherian ring and is an ideal in . Then, the quotient ring is also a Noetherian ring.
subring-closed property of commutative unital rings No Noetherianness is not subring-closed It is possible to have the following: is a Noetherian ring and is a (unital) subring of , but is not a Noetherian ring. For instance, consider any non-Noetherian integral domain; this is a subring of a field, which is Noetherian.
localization-closed property of commutative unital rings Yes Noetherianness is localization-closed Suppose is a Noetherian ring and is a multiplicatively closed subset of . Then, the localization of at is also Noetherian.
finite direct product-closed property of commutative unital rings Yes Noetherianness is finite direct product-closed Suppose are Noetherian rings. Then, the direct product is also a Noetherian ring.
completion-closed property of commutative unital rings Yes Noetherianness is completion-closed Suppose is a commutative unital ring and is a maximal ideal in . The completion of at is also Noetherian.

Relation with other properties

Conjunction with other properties

Conjunction Other component of conjunction Additional comments
Noetherian domain integral domain
reduced Noetherian ring reduced ring: it has no nonzero nilpotent elements.
Noetherian normal domain normal domain
Noetherian unique factorization domain unique factorization domain
local Noetherian ring local ring
local Noetherian domain local domain
zero-dimensional Noetherian ring zero-dimensional ring: every prime ideal in it is a maximal ideal
one-dimensional Noetherian domain one-dimensional domain: integral domain in which every nonzero prime ideal is maximal
finite-dimensional Noetherian ring finite-dimensional ring: its Krull dimension is finite.

Stronger properties

Property Meaning Proof of implication Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) Intermediate notions
Polynomial ring over a field for a field click here
Artinian ring descending chain of ideals stabilizes eventually Artinian implies Noetherian Noetherian not implies Artinian click here
Principal ideal ring every ideal is principal principal ideal ring implies Noetherian Noetherian not implies principal ideal ring click here
Dedekind domain click here
Cohen-Macaulay ring click here
Affine ring click here

Weaker properties

Property Meaning Proof of implication Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) Intermediate notions
Coherent ring click here