Principal ideal domain: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===Stronger properties=== | ===Stronger properties=== | ||
* [[Euclidean domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[Euclidean implies PID]]|[[PID not implies Euclidean]]}} | * [[Weaker than::Euclidean domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[Euclidean implies PID]]|[[PID not implies Euclidean]]}} | ||
* [[Polynomial ring over a field]] | * [[Weaker than::Polynomial ring over a field]] | ||
===Weaker properties=== | ===Weaker properties=== | ||
* [[Dedekind domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies Dedekind]]|[[Dedekind not implies PID]]}} | * [[Stronger than::Dedekind domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies Dedekind]]|[[Dedekind not implies PID]]}} | ||
* [[Bezout domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies Bezout]]|[[Bezout not implies PID]]}} | * [[Stronger than::Bezout domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies Bezout]]|[[Bezout not implies PID]]}} | ||
* [[Noetherian domain]] | * [[Stronger than::Noetherian domain]] | ||
* [[Unique factorization domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies UFD]]|[[UFD not implies PID]]}} | * [[Stronger than::Unique factorization domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies UFD]]|[[UFD not implies PID]]}} | ||
* [[Elementary divisor domain]] | * [[Stronger than::Normal domain]] | ||
* [[Stronger than::Noetherian normal domain]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::One-dimensional Noetherian domain]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::One-dimensional domain]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::Elementary divisor domain]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::gcd domain]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::Principal ideal ring]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::Noetherian ring]] | |||
* [[Stronger than::Bezout ring]] | |||
===Conjunction expressions=== | ===Conjunction expressions=== |
Revision as of 17:27, 17 January 2009
This article defines a property of integral domains, viz., a property that, given any integral domain, is either true or false for that.
The corrresponding general property for commutative unital rings is: principal ideal ring
View other properties of integral domains | View all properties of commutative unital rings
VIEW RELATED: Commutative unital ring property implications | Commutative unital ring property non-implications |Commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | Commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions | Commutative unital ring property satisfactions | Commutative unital ring property dissatisfactions
Definition
Symbol-free definition
An integral domain is termed a PID or Principal Ideal Domain if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:
- Every ideal in it is principal, viz., it is a principal ideal ring
- Every prime ideal in it is principal
- It admits a Dedekind-Hasse valuation
Note that the two conditions need not be equivalent when the underlying ring is not a domain.
Relation with other properties
Expression as a conjunction of other properties
- A principal ideal ring that is also an integral domain.
- A Noetherian domain that is also a Bezout domain (equivalently, an integral domain that is both a Noetherian ring and a Bezout ring).
- A unique factorization domain that is also a Dedekind domain.
Stronger properties
- Euclidean domain: For proof of the implication, refer Euclidean implies PID and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer PID not implies Euclidean
- Polynomial ring over a field
Weaker properties
- Dedekind domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies Dedekind and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer Dedekind not implies PID
- Bezout domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies Bezout and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer Bezout not implies PID
- Noetherian domain
- Unique factorization domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies UFD and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer UFD not implies PID
- Normal domain
- Noetherian normal domain
- One-dimensional Noetherian domain
- One-dimensional domain
- Elementary divisor domain
- gcd domain
- Principal ideal ring
- Noetherian ring
- Bezout ring
Conjunction expressions
A ring is a principal ideal domain iff it is:
- A principal ideal ring and an integral domain: This is a tautological statement
- A Noetherian ring and a Bezout domain: Further information: Noetherian and Bezout iff principal ideal
- A unique factorization domain and a Dedekind domain: Further information: Unique factorization and Dedekind iff principal ideal
Metaproperties
Polynomial-closedness
This property of commutative unital rings is not closed under passing to the polynomial ring
The polynomial ring over a PID need not be a PID. Two examples are the polynomial ring over the integers, and the polynomial ring in two variables over a field. In fact, the polynomial ring over a ring is a PID iff that ring is a field.
Closure under taking localizations
This property of integral domains is closed under taking localizations: the localization at a multiplicatively closed subset of a commutative unital ring with this property, also has this property. In particular, the localization at a prime ideal, and the localization at a maximal ideal, have the property.
View other localization-closed properties of integral domains | View other localization-closed properties of commutative unital rings
If we localize a principal ideal domain at any multiplicatively closed subset that does not contain zero, and in particular if we localize relative to a prime ideal, we continue to get a principal ideal domain. The reason is, roughly, that any ideal in the localization is generated by the element in the contraction that generates it.
Module theory
Further information: structure theory of modules over PIDs
Any finitely generated module over a PID can be expressed as follows:
where . Some of the could be zero.
The are unique upto units; the principal ideals they generate are unique.
There is another equivalent formulation:
Where all the are prime.
Thus, a finitely generated module over a PID is projective if and only if it is free.