Principal ideal domain: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Symbol-free definition=== | ===Symbol-free definition=== | ||
An [[integral domain]] is termed a '''PID''' or '''Principal Ideal Domain''' if | An [[integral domain]] is termed a '''PID''' or '''Principal Ideal Domain''' if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions: | ||
* Every [[ideal]] in it is [[principal ideal|principal]], viz., it is a [[principal ideal ring]] | |||
* Every [[prime ideal]] in it is [[principal ideal|principal]] | |||
Note that the two conditions need not be equivalent when the underlying ring is ''not'' a domain. | |||
==Relation with other properties== | ==Relation with other properties== |
Revision as of 21:57, 17 December 2007
This article defines a property of integral domains, viz., a property that, given any integral domain, is either true or false for that.
View other properties of integral domains | View all properties of commutative unital rings
VIEW RELATED: Commutative unital ring property implications | Commutative unital ring property non-implications |Commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | Commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions | Commutative unital ring property satisfactions | Commutative unital ring property dissatisfactions
Definition
Symbol-free definition
An integral domain is termed a PID or Principal Ideal Domain if it satisfies the following equivalent conditions:
- Every ideal in it is principal, viz., it is a principal ideal ring
- Every prime ideal in it is principal
Note that the two conditions need not be equivalent when the underlying ring is not a domain.
Relation with other properties
Stronger properties
- Euclidean domain: For proof of the implication, refer Euclidean implies PID and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer PID not implies Euclidean
- Polynomial ring over a field
Weaker properties
- Dedekind domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies Dedekind and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer Dedekind not implies PID
- Bezout domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies Bezout and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer Bezout not implies PID
- Noetherian domain
- Unique factorization domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies UFD and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer UFD not implies PID
- Elementary divisor domain
Metaproperties
Polynomial-closedness
This property of commutative unital rings is not closed under passing to the polynomial ring
The polynomial ring over a PID need not be a PID. Two examples are the polynomial ring over the integers, and the polynomial ring in two variables over a field. In fact, the polynomial ring over a ring is a PID iff that ring is a field.