Principal ideal domain: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
A [[commutative unital ring]] is termed a '''principal ideal domain''' (also known as '''PID''') if it is an [[integral domain]] and a [[principal ideal ring]]. Explicitly, it must satisfy the following '''equivalent''' conditions: | |||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! No. !! Shorthand !! A commutative unital ring is termed a principal ideal domain if ... !! A commutative unital ring <math>R</math> is termed a principal ideal domain if ... | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || every ideal principal || it is an [[integral domain]] and every [[ideal]] in it is [[defining ingredient::principal ideal|principal]] || <math>R</math> is an integral domain (i.e., <math>ab = 0</math> implies <math>a = 0</math> or <math>b = 0</math>) and for every ideal <math>I \subseteq R</math>, there exists <math>x \in I</math> such that <math>I = (x)</matH>, i.e., <math>I = Rx</math>. | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || every prime ideal principal || it is an [[integral domain]] and every [[defining ingredient::prime ideal]] in it is [[principal ideal|principal]] || <math>R</math> is an integral domain (i.e., <math>ab = 0</math> implies <math>a = 0</math> or <math>b = 0</math>) and for every prime ideal <math>P \subseteq R</math>, there exists <math>x \in P</math> such that <math>P = (x)</matH>, i.e., <math>P = Rx</math>. | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || Dedekind-Hasse norm || it admits a [[defining ingredient::Dedekind-Hasse norm]] || there is a Dedekind-Hasse norm on <math>R</math>. | |||
|} | |||
===Equivalence of definitions=== | ===Equivalence of definitions=== | ||
Line 16: | Line 20: | ||
* For (1) implies (3), refer [[principal ideal domain admits multiplicative Dedekind-Hasse norm]]. | * For (1) implies (3), refer [[principal ideal domain admits multiplicative Dedekind-Hasse norm]]. | ||
* For (3) implies (1), refer [[Dedekind-Hasse norm implies principal ideal ring]]. | * For (3) implies (1), refer [[Dedekind-Hasse norm implies principal ideal ring]]. | ||
==Examples== | |||
Since [[Euclidean implies PID]], all the [[Euclidean domain#Examples|typical examples of Eulidean domains]] are also examples of principal ideal domains. There are some PIDs that are not Euclidean domains -- in particular, the domain <math>\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1 + \sqrt{-19}}{2}\right]</math> is not a Euclidean domain because it does not have a universal side divisor. | |||
==Relation with other properties== | ==Relation with other properties== | ||
Line 21: | Line 29: | ||
===Expression as a conjunction of other properties=== | ===Expression as a conjunction of other properties=== | ||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! First component of conjunction !! Second component of conjunction !! Proof | |||
|- | |||
| [[principal ideal ring]] || [[integral domain]] || by definition | |||
|- | |||
| [[conjunction involving::Noetherian domain]] || [[conjunction involving::Bezout domain]] || [[Noetherian and Bezout iff principal ideal]] | |||
|- | |||
| [[conjunction involving::unique factorization domain]] || [[Bezout domain]] || [[Unique factorization and Bezout iff principal ideal]] | |||
|- | |||
| [[conjunction involving::unique factorization domain]] || [[conjunction involving::Dedekind domain]] || (see next) | |||
|- | |||
| [[unique factorization domain]] || [[conjunction involving::one-dimensional domain]] || [[Unique factorization and one-dimensional iff principal ideal]] | |||
|} | |||
===Stronger properties=== | ===Stronger properties=== | ||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Property !! Meaning !! Proof of implication !! Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! Intermediate notions | |||
|- | |||
| [[Weaker than::Euclidean domain]] || has a [[Euclidean norm]] || [[Euclidean implies PID]] || [[PID not implies Euclidean]] || {{intermediate notions short|principal ideal domain|Euclidean domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Weaker than::Polynomial ring over a field]] || <math>k[x]</math> for a [[field]] <math>k</math> || (via Euclidean domain) || (via Euclidean domain) || {{intermediate notions short|principal ideal domain|polynomial ring over a field}} | |||
|} | |||
===Weaker properties=== | ===Weaker properties=== | ||
{| class="sortable" border="1" | |||
! Property !! Meaning !! Proof of implication !! Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) !! Intermediate notions | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::Dedekind domain]] || || [[PID implies Dedekind]] ||[[Dedekind not implies PID]] || {{intermediate notions short|Dedekind domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::Bezout domain]] || [[integral domain]] where every [[finitely generated ideal]] is [[principal ideal|principal]] || [[PID implies Bezout]]||[[Bezout not implies PID]] || {{intermediate notions short|Bezout domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::Bezout ring]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|Bezout ring|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::Noetherian domain]] || [[integral domain]] that's also a [[Noetherian ring]] || [[PID implies Noetherian]] || [[Noetherian not implies principal ideal]] || {{intermediate notions short|Noetherian domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::Noetherian ring]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|Noetherian ring|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::unique factorization domain]] || [[integral domain]] with unique factorization || [[PID implies UFD]]||[[UFD not implies PID]] || {{intermediate notions short|unique factorization domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::normal domain]] || [[integral domain]] that is integrally closed in its field of fractions || (via UFD) || (via UFD) || {{intermediate notions short|normal domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::Noetherian normal domain]] || [[Noetherian ring]] and [[normal domain]] || || || {{intermediate notions short|Noetherian normal domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::One-dimensional domain]]|| [[integral domain]] in which every nonzero [[prime ideal]] is [[maximal ideal|maximal]] || [[PID implies one-dimensional]]||[[One-dimensional domain not implies PID]] || {{intermediate notions short|one-dimensional domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::One-dimensional Noetherian domain]] || [[one-dimensional ring|one-dimensional]] and [[Noetherian domain|Noetherian]] || || || {{intermediate notions short|one-dimensional Noetherian domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::elementary divisor domain]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|elementary divisor domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::gcd domain]] || || || || {{intermediate notions short|gcd domain|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::principal ideal ring]] || every ideal is [[principal ideal|principal]], not necessarily a [[integral domain|domain]] || || || {{intermediate notions short|principal ideal ring|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|- | |||
| [[Stronger than::catenary ring]] || any two saturated chains of primes with the same starting and ending point have the same length || || || {{intermediate notions short|catenary ring|principal ideal domain}} | |||
|} | |||
==Metaproperties== | ==Metaproperties== | ||
{ | {| class="sortable" border="1" | ||
! Metaproperty name !! Satisfied? !! Proof !! Statement with symbols | |||
|- | |||
| [[dissatisfies metaproperty::polynomial-closed property of commutative unital rings]] || No || follows from [[Polynomial ring over a ring is a PID iff the ring is a field]] || It is possible to have a principal ideal domain <math>R</math> such that the polynomial ring <math>R[x]</math> is not a principal ideal domain. In fact, <math>R[x]</math> is a principal ideal domain if and only if <math>R</math> is a field, so for instance <math>R = \mathbb{Z}</math> or <math>R = \mathbb{R}[x]</math> give counterexamples. | |||
|} | |||
{{localization-closed idp}} | {{localization-closed idp}} |
Latest revision as of 20:33, 29 January 2014
This article defines a property of integral domains, viz., a property that, given any integral domain, is either true or false for that.
The corrresponding general property for commutative unital rings is: principal ideal ring
View other properties of integral domains | View all properties of commutative unital rings
VIEW RELATED: Commutative unital ring property implications | Commutative unital ring property non-implications |Commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | Commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions | Commutative unital ring property satisfactions | Commutative unital ring property dissatisfactions
Definition
A commutative unital ring is termed a principal ideal domain (also known as PID) if it is an integral domain and a principal ideal ring. Explicitly, it must satisfy the following equivalent conditions:
No. | Shorthand | A commutative unital ring is termed a principal ideal domain if ... | A commutative unital ring is termed a principal ideal domain if ... |
---|---|---|---|
1 | every ideal principal | it is an integral domain and every ideal in it is principal | is an integral domain (i.e., implies or ) and for every ideal , there exists such that , i.e., . |
2 | every prime ideal principal | it is an integral domain and every prime ideal in it is principal | is an integral domain (i.e., implies or ) and for every prime ideal , there exists such that , i.e., . |
3 | Dedekind-Hasse norm | it admits a Dedekind-Hasse norm | there is a Dedekind-Hasse norm on . |
Equivalence of definitions
- For the equivalence of definitions (1) and (2), refer Principal ideal ring iff every prime ideal is principal.
- For (1) implies (3), refer principal ideal domain admits multiplicative Dedekind-Hasse norm.
- For (3) implies (1), refer Dedekind-Hasse norm implies principal ideal ring.
Examples
Since Euclidean implies PID, all the typical examples of Eulidean domains are also examples of principal ideal domains. There are some PIDs that are not Euclidean domains -- in particular, the domain is not a Euclidean domain because it does not have a universal side divisor.
Relation with other properties
Expression as a conjunction of other properties
First component of conjunction | Second component of conjunction | Proof |
---|---|---|
principal ideal ring | integral domain | by definition |
Noetherian domain | Bezout domain | Noetherian and Bezout iff principal ideal |
unique factorization domain | Bezout domain | Unique factorization and Bezout iff principal ideal |
unique factorization domain | Dedekind domain | (see next) |
unique factorization domain | one-dimensional domain | Unique factorization and one-dimensional iff principal ideal |
Stronger properties
Property | Meaning | Proof of implication | Proof of strictness (reverse implication failure) | Intermediate notions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Euclidean domain | has a Euclidean norm | Euclidean implies PID | PID not implies Euclidean | click here |
Polynomial ring over a field | for a field | (via Euclidean domain) | (via Euclidean domain) | click here |
Weaker properties
Metaproperties
Metaproperty name | Satisfied? | Proof | Statement with symbols |
---|---|---|---|
polynomial-closed property of commutative unital rings | No | follows from Polynomial ring over a ring is a PID iff the ring is a field | It is possible to have a principal ideal domain such that the polynomial ring is not a principal ideal domain. In fact, is a principal ideal domain if and only if is a field, so for instance or give counterexamples. |
Closure under taking localizations
This property of integral domains is closed under taking localizations: the localization at a multiplicatively closed subset of a commutative unital ring with this property, also has this property. In particular, the localization at a prime ideal, and the localization at a maximal ideal, have the property.
View other localization-closed properties of integral domains | View other localization-closed properties of commutative unital rings
If we localize a principal ideal domain at any multiplicatively closed subset that does not contain zero, and in particular if we localize relative to a prime ideal, we continue to get a principal ideal domain. The reason is, roughly, that any ideal in the localization is generated by the element in the contraction that generates it.
Closure under quotients by prime ideals
This property of integral domains is prime-quotient-closed: the quotient of any integral domain satisfying this property by a prime ideal also satisfies the property. Note that we need the ideal to be prime for the quotient to also be an integral domain.
View other prime-quotient-closed properties of integral domains
The quotient of a principal ideal domain by any prime ideal is again a principal ideal domain. In fact, the quotient is either equal to the original domain (in case the prime ideal is zero) or is a field (in case the prime ideal is maximal. This is because in a principal ideal domain, every nonzero prime ideal is maximal.
However, it is true in slightly greater generality that the quotient of a principal ideal ring by any ideal is again a principal ideal ring. For full proof, refer: Principal ideal ring is quotient-closed
Module theory
Further information: structure theory of modules over PIDs
Any finitely generated module over a PID can be expressed as follows:
where . Some of the could be zero.
The are unique upto units; the principal ideals they generate are unique.
There is another equivalent formulation:
Where all the are prime.
Thus, a finitely generated module over a PID is projective if and only if it is free.