Irreducible not implies universal side divisor

From Commalg

Statement

An irreducible element in an integral domain need not be a universal side divisor. In fact, an irreducible element need not be a universal side divisor even in a Euclidean domain.

Related facts

Converse

Caveats

There are some Euclidean domains where every irreducible element is a universal side divisor. For instance:

  • Suppose is an algebraically closed field. Then, the polynomial ring has the property that every irreducible polynomial is a universal side divisor. This is because in a polynomial ring, the universal side divisors are precisely the nonconstant linear polynomials, and the field being algebraically closed is precisely equivalent to saying that these are the only irreducible polynomials.
  • In a discrete valuation ring, the uniformizing parameter, which is the unique irreducible (up to associates) is a universal side divisor. (Note that since both the property of being irreducible and the property of being a universal side divisor are preserved up to associates in an integral domain, this makes sense).

Proof

Example of the ring of integers

Further information: ring of rational integers

In the ring of rational integers , the only universal side divisors are the elements . However, there are infinitely many primes. In particular, are irreducibles that are not universal side divisors.

Example of the polynomial ring over a field that is not algebraically closed

Further information: polynomial ring over a field

Let be a field that is not algebraically closed. In the polynomial ring , the universal side divisors are precisely the nonconstant linear polynomials. However, since is not algebraically closed, there exists an irreducible polynomial of degree greater than in the polynomial ring . Thus, there is an irreducible element that is not a universal side divisor.

For instance, if , the polynomial is irreducible but not a universal side divisor.