Cohen-Macaulay is polynomial-closed

From Commalg

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a commutative unital ring property satisfying a commutative unital ring metaproperty
View all commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | View all commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for commutative unital ring properties
|

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of commutative unital rings of being Cohen-Macaulay satisfies the metaproperty of commutative unital rings of being polynomial-closed.

Verbal statement

The polynomial ring in one variable over a Cohen-Macaulay ring, is again Cohen-Macaulay.

Definitions used

Cohen-Macaulay ring

Further information: Cohen-Macaulay ring

A Noetherian ring is termed Cohen-Macaulay if for every ideal, the depth equals the codimension.

Facts used

Proof

Given: A Cohen-Macaulay ring , and the polynomial ring

To prove: is a Cohen-Macaulay ring

Reduction to a local case

By the strongly local nature of the Cohen-Macaulay property, it suffices to show that for every maximal ideal of , the localization is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. Let be the contraction of to (in other words, ). Clearly is a prime ideal in (because primeness is contraction-closed).

A little thought reveals that:

where denotes localization at the prime ideal , and denotes the ideal generated by in . Thus, by passing to , we may without loss of generality assume that is a local ring with maximal ideal . In particular, we may asume that is a field.

Note that for this step of the reduction, we're using the fact that since is Cohen-Macaulay, so is .

The depth increases by at least one

Notation as before: is a local Cohen-Macaulay ring, is its unique maximal ideal, and is an ideal of that contracts to .

Now, consider . This is the same as , which is a polynomial ring over a field, hence a principal ideal. The image is thus a principal ideal in this field, and since it is also prime, it must be generated by a monic polynomial, say . Pulling back, we see that is generated by and a monic polynomial (any pullback of ).

Now, any regular sequence in in continues to remain a regular sequence inside the ring . Augmenting with at the end, we get a regular sequence for in (we use the fact that by our construction is not a zero divisor in the quotient). Thus, the depth of in is at least 1 more than the depth of in .

The codimension increases by at most one

This follows from Krull's principal ideal theorem.

Putting the pieces together

  • Since is Cohen-Macaulay, the depth and codimension of are equal
  • The codimension of is at most one more than this, and the depth of is at least one more than this
  • Hence the depth of is at least equal to the codimension of
  • On the other hand, we know that the depth of is at most equal to the codimension of , for any
  • Hence, the depth and codimension of are equal

References

Textbook references