Cohen-Macaulay is polynomial-closed
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a commutative unital ring property satisfying a commutative unital ring metaproperty
View all commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | View all commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for commutative unital ring properties
|
Statement
Property-theoretic statement
The property of commutative unital rings of being Cohen-Macaulay satisfies the metaproperty of commutative unital rings of being polynomial-closed.
Verbal statement
The polynomial ring in one variable over a Cohen-Macaulay ring, is again Cohen-Macaulay.
Definitions used
Cohen-Macaulay ring
Further information: Cohen-Macaulay ring
A Noetherian ring is termed Cohen-Macaulay if for every ideal, the depth equals the codimension.
Facts used
- Cohen-Macaulay is strongly local: A ring is Cohen-Macaulay iff its localization at every maximal ideal is Cohen-Macaulay.
- Krull's principal ideal theorem
Proof
Given: A Cohen-Macaulay ring , and the polynomial ring
To prove: is a Cohen-Macaulay ring
Reduction to a local case
By the strongly local nature of the Cohen-Macaulay property, it suffices to show that for every maximal ideal of , the localization is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. Let be the contraction of to (in other words, ). Clearly is a prime ideal in (because primeness is contraction-closed).
A little thought reveals that:
where denotes localization at the prime ideal , and denotes the ideal generated by in . Thus, by passing to , we may without loss of generality assume that is a local ring with maximal ideal . In particular, we may asume that is a field.
Note that for this step of the reduction, we're using the fact that since is Cohen-Macaulay, so is .
The depth increases by at least one
Notation as before: is a local Cohen-Macaulay ring, is its unique maximal ideal, and is an ideal of that contracts to .
Now, consider . This is the same as , which is a polynomial ring over a field, hence a principal ideal. The image is thus a principal ideal in this field, and since it is also prime, it must be generated by a monic polynomial, say . Pulling back, we see that is generated by and a monic polynomial (any pullback of ).
Now, any regular sequence in in continues to remain a regular sequence inside the ring . Augmenting with at the end, we get a regular sequence for in (we use the fact that by our construction is not a zero divisor in the quotient). Thus, the depth of in is at least 1 more than the depth of in .
The codimension increases by at most one
This follows from Krull's principal ideal theorem.
Putting the pieces together
- Since is Cohen-Macaulay, the depth and codimension of are equal
- The codimension of is at most one more than this, and the depth of is at least one more than this
- Hence the depth of is at least equal to the codimension of
- On the other hand, we know that the depth of is at most equal to the codimension of , for any
- Hence, the depth and codimension of are equal
References
Textbook references
- Book:Eisenbud, Page 456-457