Universal side divisor implies irreducible

From Commalg
Revision as of 17:54, 31 January 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Statement== In an integral domain, any fact about::universal side divisor is an fact about::irreducible element. ==Related facts== ===Converse=== The converse is not true...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Statement

In an integral domain, any universal side divisor is an irreducible element.

Related facts

Converse

The converse is not true, even in a Euclidean domain. Further information: Irreducible not implies universal side divisor

Other related facts

Proof

Given: An integral domain R, a universal side divisor xR such that x=ab.

To prove: x is neither zero nor a unit, and either a is a unit or b is a unit.

Proof: The fact that x is neither zero nor a unit follows form the definition of universal side divisor, so it remains to show that if x=ab, then either a is a unit or b is a unit.

Since x is a universal side divisor, we obtain that either x|a or there exists a unit u such that x|au.

  1. Case x|a: We have a=xy for some y, and we get x=xyb, yielding x(1yb)=0. Since x0 and R is an integral domain, we obtain by=1, so b is a unit.
  2. Case there exists a unit u such that x|au: We have au=xy for some y, yielding u=axy=aaby=a(1by). Since u is a unit, there exists v such that uv=1, yielding a(1by)v=1, so a is a unit with inverse (1by)v.