Krull intersection theorem for Noetherian domains

From Commalg
Revision as of 19:09, 3 March 2008 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (New page: {{applicationof|Krull intersection theorem}} ==Statement== Let <math>R</math> be an integral domain and <math>I</math> a proper ideal in <math>R</math>. Then, we have: <math>\bi...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This fact is an application of the following pivotal fact/result/idea: Krull intersection theorem
View other applications of Krull intersection theorem OR Read a survey article on applying Krull intersection theorem

Statement

Let R be an integral domain and I a proper ideal in R. Then, we have:

⋂j=1∞Ij=0

Proof

Applying Krull intersection theorem for modules

The Krull intersection theorem states that if M is a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring R and I is an ideal inside R, then there exists r∈I such that:

(1−r)(⋂j=1∞IjM)=0

We apply this to the case where M=R, to get that there exists r∈I, such that:

(1−r)(⋂j=1∞Ij)=0

Applying the integral domain condition and properness of the ideal

Since I is a proper ideal, 1∉I. Hence r≠1, so the element 1−r cannot be zero.

Thus, by the fact that we are in an integral domain, and by the above equation, we get:

⋂j=1∞Ij=0