Universal side divisor implies irreducible

From Commalg
Revision as of 17:54, 31 January 2009 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Statement== In an integral domain, any fact about::universal side divisor is an fact about::irreducible element. ==Related facts== ===Converse=== The converse is not true...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Statement

In an integral domain, any universal side divisor is an irreducible element.

Related facts

Converse

The converse is not true, even in a Euclidean domain. Further information: Irreducible not implies universal side divisor

Other related facts

Proof

Given: An integral domain , a universal side divisor such that .

To prove: is neither zero nor a unit, and either is a unit or is a unit.

Proof: The fact that is neither zero nor a unit follows form the definition of universal side divisor, so it remains to show that if , then either is a unit or is a unit.

Since is a universal side divisor, we obtain that either or there exists a unit such that .

  1. Case : We have for some , and we get , yielding . Since and is an integral domain, we obtain , so is a unit.
  2. Case there exists a unit such that : We have for some , yielding . Since is a unit, there exists such that , yielding , so is a unit with inverse .