Krull intersection theorem for Jacobson radical: Difference between revisions
(New page: ==Statement== Let <math>R</math> be a Noetherian ring and <math>I</math> an ideal contained inside the Jacobson radical of <math>R</math>. Then, we have: <math>\bigcap_{j=1}^\inf...) |
(→Proof) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Applying the Krull intersection theorem for modules=== | ===Applying the Krull intersection theorem for modules=== | ||
We apply the [[Krull intersection theorem for modules]], which states that | We apply the [[Krull intersection theorem for modules]], which states that if <math>R</math> is a [[Noetherian ring]] and <math>M</math> is a [[finitely generated module]] over <math>R</math>, and <math>I</math> is an ideal in <math>R</math>, we have: | ||
<math>I\left(\bigcap_{j=1}^\infty I^jM \right) = \bigcap_{j=1}^\infty I^jM</math> | |||
We apply it to the case <math>M = R</math>. We thus get: | |||
<math>I\left(\bigcap_{j=1}^\infty I^j \right) = \bigcap_{j=1}^\infty I^j</math> | |||
===Applying Nakayama's lemma=== | |||
Consider the ideal <math>N = \bigcap_{j=1}^\infty I^j</math> as a <math>R</math>-module. Since <math>IN = N</math>, and <math>I</math> is contained in the [[Jacobson radical]] of <math>R</math>, [[Nakayama's lemma]] tells us that <math>N = 0</math>. This is precisely what we want. |
Revision as of 18:56, 3 March 2008
Statement
Let be a Noetherian ring and an ideal contained inside the Jacobson radical of . Then, we have:
In particular, when is a local ring, then the above holds for any proper ideal .
Proof
Applying the Krull intersection theorem for modules
We apply the Krull intersection theorem for modules, which states that if is a Noetherian ring and is a finitely generated module over , and is an ideal in , we have:
We apply it to the case . We thus get:
Applying Nakayama's lemma
Consider the ideal as a -module. Since , and is contained in the Jacobson radical of , Nakayama's lemma tells us that . This is precisely what we want.