Ideal in integral domain implies self-similar: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>A</math> is an integral domain, and <math>I</math> is an ideal of <math>A</math>. Consider <math>I</math> as an <math>A</math>-module. Then, any nonzero <m...)
 
m (1 revision)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:23, 12 May 2008

Statement

Suppose is an integral domain, and is an ideal of . Consider as an -module. Then, any nonzero -submodule of contains a submodule isomorphic to (as an -module).

Proof

Given: is an integral domain, and is an ideal of . is a nonzero -submodule of

To prove: contains a submodule isomorphic to as an -module.

Proof: Pick . Consider the submodule . There is a natural homomorphism:

from to . Since the multiplication is within an integral domain, the map is injective, and by definition, it is surjective. We thus have an isomorphism.