Principal ideal domain: Difference between revisions
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
===Weaker properties=== | ===Weaker properties=== | ||
* [[Dedekind domain]] | * [[Dedekind domain]]: {{proofofstrictimplicationat|[[PID implies Dedekind]]|[[Dedekind not implies PID]]}} | ||
* [[Bezout domain]] | * [[Bezout domain]] | ||
* [[Noetherian domain]] | * [[Noetherian domain]] |
Revision as of 23:24, 16 December 2007
This article defines a property of integral domains, viz., a property that, given any integral domain, is either true or false for that.
View other properties of integral domains | View all properties of commutative unital rings
VIEW RELATED: Commutative unital ring property implications | Commutative unital ring property non-implications |Commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | Commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions | Commutative unital ring property satisfactions | Commutative unital ring property dissatisfactions
Definition
Symbol-free definition
An integral domain is termed a PID or Principal Ideal Domain if every ideal in it is principal.
Relation with other properties
Stronger properties
- Euclidean domain: For proof of the implication, refer Euclidean implies PID and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer PID not implies Euclidean
- Polynomial ring over a field
Weaker properties
- Dedekind domain: For proof of the implication, refer PID implies Dedekind and for proof of its strictness (i.e. the reverse implication being false) refer Dedekind not implies PID
- Bezout domain
- Noetherian domain
- Unique factorization domain
- Elementary divisor domain
Metaproperties
Polynomial-closedness
This property of commutative unital rings is not closed under passing to the polynomial ring
The polynomial ring over a PID need not be a PID. Two examples are the polynomial ring over the integers, and the polynomial ring in two variables over a field. In fact, the polynomial ring over a ring is a PID iff that ring is a field.