Universal side divisor implies irreducible: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 14: Line 14:
* [[Associate implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units in integral domain]]
* [[Associate implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units in integral domain]]
* [[Associate not implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units]]
* [[Associate not implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units]]
* [[Element of smallest norm among non-units in Euclidean ring is a universal side divisor]]
* [[Element of minimum norm among non-units in Euclidean ring is a universal side divisor]]
* [[Euclidean ring that is not a field has a universal side divisor]]
* [[Euclidean ring that is not a field has a universal side divisor]]
==Proof==
==Proof==

Latest revision as of 16:01, 5 February 2009

Statement

In an commutative unital ring, any universal side divisor is an irreducible element.

Related facts

Converse

The converse is not true, even in a Euclidean domain. Further information: Irreducible not implies universal side divisor

Other related facts

Proof

Given: A commutative unital ring , a universal side divisor such that .

To prove: is neither zero nor a unit, and either is a unit or is a unit.

Proof: The fact that is neither zero nor a unit follows form the definition of universal side divisor, so it remains to show that if , then either is a unit or is a unit.

Since is a universal side divisor, we obtain that either or there exists a unit such that .

  1. Case : In this case we have and , so and are associates, and we are done.
  2. Case there exists a unit such that : We have for some , yielding . Since is a unit, there exists such that , yielding , so is a unit with inverse . Thus, is associate with , and we are done.