Nakayama's lemma: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
m (5 revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
# If <math>m_1, m_2, \ldots, m_n</math> have images in <math>M/IM</math> that generate it as a <math>R</math>-module, then <math>m_1, m_2, \ldots, m_n</math> generate <math>M</math> as a <math>R</math>-module
# If <math>m_1, m_2, \ldots, m_n</math> have images in <math>M/IM</math> that generate it as a <math>R</math>-module, then <math>m_1, m_2, \ldots, m_n</math> generate <math>M</math> as a <math>R</math>-module


In the particular case where <math>R</math> is a [[local ring]], the Jacobson radical is the unique [[maximal ideal]] in <math>R</math>.
==Related facts==
==Related facts==


The [[graded Nakayama's lemma]] is a related fact true for [[graded ring]]s.
The [[graded Nakayama's lemma]] is a related fact true for [[graded ring]]s.

Latest revision as of 16:27, 12 May 2008

This article is about the statement of a simple but indispensable lemma in commutative algebra
View other indispensable lemmata

Statement

Let R be a commutative unital ring, and I be an ideal contained inside the Jacobson radical of R. Let M be a finitely generated R-module. Then the following are true:

  1. If IM=M then M=0
  2. If N is a submodule of M such that N+IM=M, then N=M
  3. If m1,m2,,mn have images in M/IM that generate it as a R-module, then m1,m2,,mn generate M as a R-module

In the particular case where R is a local ring, the Jacobson radical is the unique maximal ideal in R.

Related facts

The graded Nakayama's lemma is a related fact true for graded rings.