Ideal in integral domain implies self-similar: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
(New page: ==Statement== Suppose <math>A</math> is an integral domain, and <math>I</math> is an ideal of <math>A</math>. Consider <math>I</math> as an <math>A</math>-module. Then, any nonzero <m...)
 
m (1 revision)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:23, 12 May 2008

Statement

Suppose A is an integral domain, and I is an ideal of A. Consider I as an A-module. Then, any nonzero A-submodule of I contains a submodule isomorphic to I (as an A-module).

Proof

Given: A is an integral domain, and I is an ideal of A. N is a nonzero A-submodule of I

To prove: N contains a submodule J isomorphic to I as an A-module.

Proof: Pick 0xN. Consider the submodule xI. There is a natural homomorphism:

axa

from I to xI. Since the multiplication is within an integral domain, the map is injective, and by definition, it is surjective. We thus have an isomorphism.