Krull's height theorem: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
 
m (2 revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
Let <math>R</math> be a [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian]] [[commutative unital ring]] and <math>x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_c</math> be elements in <math>R</math>. Let <math>P</math> be minimal among primes containing all the <math>x_i</math>s. Then, the codimension of <math>P</math> is at most <math>c</math>.
Let <math>R</math> be a [[Noetherian ring|Noetherian]] [[commutative unital ring]] and <math>x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_c</math> be elements in <math>R</math>. Let <math>P</math> be minimal among primes containing all the <math>x_i</math>s. Then, the codimension of <math>P</math> is at most <math>c</math>.


There is also a converseof this statement viz [[converse of Krull's height theorem]].
There is also a converse of this statement viz [[converse of Krull's height theorem]].
 
==Proof==
 
===Starting assumptions===
 
Replacing <math>R</math> by <math>R_P</math> if necessary, we may assume that <math>R</math> is a [[local ring]] with unique [[maximal ideal]] <math>P</math>.
 
In particular, we see that the ring <math>R/(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_c)</math> is a [[local Artinian ring]] with unique maximal ideal <math>P/(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_c)</math>, hence <math>P</math> is nilpotent modulo <math>(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_c)</math>.
 
===Main proof===
 
Supose <math>P_1</math> is a prime contained in <math>P</math>, with no primes between. Then, it suffices to show, inductively, that <math>P_1</math> is minimal over an ideal generated by <math>c-1</math> elements.

Latest revision as of 16:26, 12 May 2008

Statement

Let R be a Noetherian commutative unital ring and x1,x2,,xc be elements in R. Let P be minimal among primes containing all the xis. Then, the codimension of P is at most c.

There is also a converse of this statement viz converse of Krull's height theorem.

Proof

Starting assumptions

Replacing R by RP if necessary, we may assume that R is a local ring with unique maximal ideal P.

In particular, we see that the ring R/(x1,x2,,xc) is a local Artinian ring with unique maximal ideal P/(x1,x2,,xc), hence P is nilpotent modulo (x1,x2,,xc).

Main proof

Supose P1 is a prime contained in P, with no primes between. Then, it suffices to show, inductively, that P1 is minimal over an ideal generated by c1 elements.