Universal side divisor implies irreducible: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 14: Line 14:
* [[Associate implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units in integral domain]]
* [[Associate implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units in integral domain]]
* [[Associate not implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units]]
* [[Associate not implies same orbit under multiplication by group of units]]
* [[Element of smallest norm among non-units in Euclidean ring is a universal side divisor]]
* [[Element of minimum norm among non-units in Euclidean ring is a universal side divisor]]
* [[Euclidean ring that is not a field has a universal side divisor]]
* [[Euclidean ring that is not a field has a universal side divisor]]
==Proof==
==Proof==

Latest revision as of 16:01, 5 February 2009

Statement

In an commutative unital ring, any universal side divisor is an irreducible element.

Related facts

Converse

The converse is not true, even in a Euclidean domain. Further information: Irreducible not implies universal side divisor

Other related facts

Proof

Given: A commutative unital ring R, a universal side divisor xR such that x=ab.

To prove: x is neither zero nor a unit, and either a is a unit or b is a unit.

Proof: The fact that x is neither zero nor a unit follows form the definition of universal side divisor, so it remains to show that if x=ab, then either a is a unit or b is a unit.

Since x is a universal side divisor, we obtain that either x|a or there exists a unit u such that x|au.

  1. Case x|a: In this case we have x|a and a|x, so x and a are associates, and we are done.
  2. Case there exists a unit u such that x|au: We have au=xy for some y, yielding u=axy=aaby=a(1by). Since u is a unit, there exists v such that uv=1, yielding a(1by)v=1, so a is a unit with inverse (1by)v. Thus, x is associate with b, and we are done.