Cohen-Macaulay is polynomial-closed: Difference between revisions
(New page: {{curing metaproperty satisfaction}} ==Statement== ===Property-theoretic statement=== The property of commutative unital rings of being Cohen-Macaulay satisfi...) |
m (2 revisions) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Definitions used== | ==Definitions used== | ||
===Cohen-Macaulay ring=== | |||
{{further|[[Cohen-Macaulay ring]]}} | |||
A [[Noetherian ring]] is termed Cohen-Macaulay if for every ideal, the [[depth of an ideal|depth]] equals the [[codimension of an ideal|codimension]]. | |||
==Facts used== | ==Facts used== | ||
* [[Cohen-Macaulay is strongly local]]: A ring is Cohen-Macaulay iff its localization at every maximal ideal is Cohen-Macaulay. | |||
* [[Krull's principal ideal theorem]] | |||
==Proof== | |||
''Given'': A [[Cohen-Macaulay ring]] <math>R</math>, and the polynomial ring <math>R[x]</math> | |||
''To prove'': <math>R[x]</math> is a Cohen-Macaulay ring | |||
===Reduction to a local case=== | |||
By the strongly local nature of the Cohen-Macaulay property, it suffices to show that for every maximal ideal <math>P</math> of <math>R[x]</math>, the localization <math>R[x]_P</math> is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. Let <math>Q</math> be the [[contraction]] of <math>P</math> to <math>R</math> (in other words, <math>Q = P \cap R</math>). Clearly <math>Q</math> is a prime ideal in <math>R</math> (because [[primeness is contraction-closed]]). | |||
A little thought reveals that: | |||
<math>R[x]_P = R_Q[x]_{P_Q}</math> | |||
where <math>R_Q</math> denotes localization at the prime ideal <math>Q</math>, and <math>P_Q</math> denotes the ideal generated by <math>P</math> in <math>R_Q[x]</math>. Thus, by passing to <math>R_P</math>, we may without loss of generality assume that <math>R</math> is a local ring with maximal ideal <math>Q</math>. In particular, we may asume that <math>R/Q</math> is a [[field]]. | |||
Note that for this step of the reduction, we're using the fact that since <math>R</math> is Cohen-Macaulay, so is <math>R_Q</math>. | |||
===The depth increases by at least one=== | |||
Notation as before: <math>R</math> is a local Cohen-Macaulay ring, <math>Q</math> is its unique maximal ideal, and <math>P</math> is an ideal of <math>R[x]</math> that contracts to <math>Q</math>. | |||
Now, consider <math>R[x]/QR[x]</math>. This is the same as <math>(R/Q)[x]</math>, which is a [[polynomial ring over a field]], hence a [[principal ideal]]. The image <math>P/QR[x]</math> is thus a principal ideal in this field, and since it is also prime, it must be generated by a monic polynomial, say <math>f</math>. Pulling back, we see that <math>P</math> is generated by <math>Q</math> and a monic polynomial (any pullback of <math>f</math>). | |||
Now, any regular sequence in <math>Q</math> in <math>R</math> continues to remain a regular sequence inside the ring <math>R[x]</math>. Augmenting with <math>f</math> at the end, we get a regular sequence for <math>P</math> in <math>R</math> (we use the fact that by our construction <math>f</math> is not a zero divisor in the quotient). Thus, the depth of <math>P</math> in <math>R[x]</math> is at least 1 more than the depth of <math>Q</math> in <math>R</math>. | |||
===The codimension increases by at most one=== | |||
This follows from [[Krull's principal ideal theorem]]. | |||
===Putting the pieces together=== | |||
* Since <math>R</math> is Cohen-Macaulay, the depth and codimension of <math>Q</math> are equal | |||
* The codimension of <math>P</math> is at most one more than this, and the depth of <math>P</math> is at least one more than this | |||
* Hence the depth of <math>P</math> is at least equal to the codimension of <math>P</math> | |||
* On the other hand, we know that the depth of <math>P</math> is at most equal to the codimension of <math>P</math>, for any <math>P</math> | |||
* Hence, the depth and codimension of <math>P</math> are equal | |||
==References== | |||
===Textbook references=== | |||
* {{booklink|Eisenbud}}, Page 456-457 |
Latest revision as of 16:19, 12 May 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a commutative unital ring property satisfying a commutative unital ring metaproperty
View all commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | View all commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for commutative unital ring properties
|
Statement
Property-theoretic statement
The property of commutative unital rings of being Cohen-Macaulay satisfies the metaproperty of commutative unital rings of being polynomial-closed.
Verbal statement
The polynomial ring in one variable over a Cohen-Macaulay ring, is again Cohen-Macaulay.
Definitions used
Cohen-Macaulay ring
Further information: Cohen-Macaulay ring
A Noetherian ring is termed Cohen-Macaulay if for every ideal, the depth equals the codimension.
Facts used
- Cohen-Macaulay is strongly local: A ring is Cohen-Macaulay iff its localization at every maximal ideal is Cohen-Macaulay.
- Krull's principal ideal theorem
Proof
Given: A Cohen-Macaulay ring , and the polynomial ring
To prove: is a Cohen-Macaulay ring
Reduction to a local case
By the strongly local nature of the Cohen-Macaulay property, it suffices to show that for every maximal ideal of , the localization is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. Let be the contraction of to (in other words, ). Clearly is a prime ideal in (because primeness is contraction-closed).
A little thought reveals that:
where denotes localization at the prime ideal , and denotes the ideal generated by in . Thus, by passing to , we may without loss of generality assume that is a local ring with maximal ideal . In particular, we may asume that is a field.
Note that for this step of the reduction, we're using the fact that since is Cohen-Macaulay, so is .
The depth increases by at least one
Notation as before: is a local Cohen-Macaulay ring, is its unique maximal ideal, and is an ideal of that contracts to .
Now, consider . This is the same as , which is a polynomial ring over a field, hence a principal ideal. The image is thus a principal ideal in this field, and since it is also prime, it must be generated by a monic polynomial, say . Pulling back, we see that is generated by and a monic polynomial (any pullback of ).
Now, any regular sequence in in continues to remain a regular sequence inside the ring . Augmenting with at the end, we get a regular sequence for in (we use the fact that by our construction is not a zero divisor in the quotient). Thus, the depth of in is at least 1 more than the depth of in .
The codimension increases by at most one
This follows from Krull's principal ideal theorem.
Putting the pieces together
- Since is Cohen-Macaulay, the depth and codimension of are equal
- The codimension of is at most one more than this, and the depth of is at least one more than this
- Hence the depth of is at least equal to the codimension of
- On the other hand, we know that the depth of is at most equal to the codimension of , for any
- Hence, the depth and codimension of are equal
References
Textbook references
- Book:Eisenbud, Page 456-457