Cohen-Macaulay is polynomial-closed: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
(New page: {{curing metaproperty satisfaction}} ==Statement== ===Property-theoretic statement=== The property of commutative unital rings of being Cohen-Macaulay satisfi...)
 
m (2 revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


==Definitions used==
==Definitions used==
===Cohen-Macaulay ring===
{{further|[[Cohen-Macaulay ring]]}}
A [[Noetherian ring]] is termed Cohen-Macaulay if for every ideal, the [[depth of an ideal|depth]] equals the [[codimension of an ideal|codimension]].


==Facts used==
==Facts used==
* [[Cohen-Macaulay is strongly local]]: A ring is Cohen-Macaulay iff its localization at every maximal ideal is Cohen-Macaulay.
* [[Krull's principal ideal theorem]]
==Proof==
''Given'': A [[Cohen-Macaulay ring]] <math>R</math>, and the polynomial ring <math>R[x]</math>
''To prove'': <math>R[x]</math> is a Cohen-Macaulay ring
===Reduction to a local case===
By the strongly local nature of the Cohen-Macaulay property, it suffices to show that for every maximal ideal <math>P</math> of <math>R[x]</math>, the localization <math>R[x]_P</math> is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. Let <math>Q</math> be the [[contraction]] of <math>P</math> to <math>R</math> (in other words, <math>Q = P \cap R</math>). Clearly <math>Q</math> is a prime ideal in <math>R</math> (because [[primeness is contraction-closed]]).
A little thought reveals that:
<math>R[x]_P = R_Q[x]_{P_Q}</math>
where <math>R_Q</math> denotes localization at the prime ideal <math>Q</math>, and <math>P_Q</math> denotes the ideal generated by <math>P</math> in <math>R_Q[x]</math>. Thus, by passing to <math>R_P</math>, we may without loss of generality assume that <math>R</math> is a local ring with maximal ideal <math>Q</math>. In particular, we may asume that <math>R/Q</math> is a [[field]].
Note that for this step of the reduction, we're using the fact that since <math>R</math> is Cohen-Macaulay, so is <math>R_Q</math>.
===The depth increases by at least one===
Notation as before: <math>R</math> is a local Cohen-Macaulay ring, <math>Q</math> is its unique maximal ideal, and <math>P</math> is an ideal of <math>R[x]</math> that contracts to <math>Q</math>.
Now, consider <math>R[x]/QR[x]</math>. This is the same as <math>(R/Q)[x]</math>, which is a [[polynomial ring over a field]], hence a [[principal ideal]]. The image <math>P/QR[x]</math> is thus a principal ideal in this field, and since it is also prime, it must be generated by a monic polynomial, say <math>f</math>. Pulling back, we see that <math>P</math> is generated by <math>Q</math> and a monic polynomial (any pullback of <math>f</math>).
Now, any regular sequence in <math>Q</math> in <math>R</math> continues to remain a regular sequence inside the ring <math>R[x]</math>. Augmenting with <math>f</math> at the end, we get a regular sequence for <math>P</math> in <math>R</math> (we use the fact that by our construction <math>f</math> is not a zero divisor in the quotient). Thus, the depth of <math>P</math> in <math>R[x]</math> is at least 1 more than the depth of <math>Q</math> in <math>R</math>.
===The codimension increases by at most one===
This follows from [[Krull's principal ideal theorem]].
===Putting the pieces together===
* Since <math>R</math> is Cohen-Macaulay, the depth and codimension of <math>Q</math> are equal
* The codimension of <math>P</math> is at most one more than this, and the depth of <math>P</math> is at least one more than this
* Hence the depth of <math>P</math> is at least equal to the codimension of <math>P</math>
* On the other hand, we know that the depth of <math>P</math> is at most equal to the codimension of <math>P</math>, for any <math>P</math>
* Hence, the depth and codimension of <math>P</math> are equal
==References==
===Textbook references===
* {{booklink|Eisenbud}}, Page 456-457

Latest revision as of 16:19, 12 May 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, of a commutative unital ring property satisfying a commutative unital ring metaproperty
View all commutative unital ring metaproperty satisfactions | View all commutative unital ring metaproperty dissatisfactions |Get help on looking up metaproperty (dis)satisfactions for commutative unital ring properties
|

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of commutative unital rings of being Cohen-Macaulay satisfies the metaproperty of commutative unital rings of being polynomial-closed.

Verbal statement

The polynomial ring in one variable over a Cohen-Macaulay ring, is again Cohen-Macaulay.

Definitions used

Cohen-Macaulay ring

Further information: Cohen-Macaulay ring

A Noetherian ring is termed Cohen-Macaulay if for every ideal, the depth equals the codimension.

Facts used

Proof

Given: A Cohen-Macaulay ring , and the polynomial ring

To prove: is a Cohen-Macaulay ring

Reduction to a local case

By the strongly local nature of the Cohen-Macaulay property, it suffices to show that for every maximal ideal of , the localization is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. Let be the contraction of to (in other words, ). Clearly is a prime ideal in (because primeness is contraction-closed).

A little thought reveals that:

where denotes localization at the prime ideal , and denotes the ideal generated by in . Thus, by passing to , we may without loss of generality assume that is a local ring with maximal ideal . In particular, we may asume that is a field.

Note that for this step of the reduction, we're using the fact that since is Cohen-Macaulay, so is .

The depth increases by at least one

Notation as before: is a local Cohen-Macaulay ring, is its unique maximal ideal, and is an ideal of that contracts to .

Now, consider . This is the same as , which is a polynomial ring over a field, hence a principal ideal. The image is thus a principal ideal in this field, and since it is also prime, it must be generated by a monic polynomial, say . Pulling back, we see that is generated by and a monic polynomial (any pullback of ).

Now, any regular sequence in in continues to remain a regular sequence inside the ring . Augmenting with at the end, we get a regular sequence for in (we use the fact that by our construction is not a zero divisor in the quotient). Thus, the depth of in is at least 1 more than the depth of in .

The codimension increases by at most one

This follows from Krull's principal ideal theorem.

Putting the pieces together

  • Since is Cohen-Macaulay, the depth and codimension of are equal
  • The codimension of is at most one more than this, and the depth of is at least one more than this
  • Hence the depth of is at least equal to the codimension of
  • On the other hand, we know that the depth of is at most equal to the codimension of , for any
  • Hence, the depth and codimension of are equal

References

Textbook references