Difference between revisions of "Every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal"

From Commalg
Jump to: navigation, search
m (1 revision)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:20, 12 May 2008


Let R be a commutative unital ring. Then, every proper ideal (i.e. every ideal that is not the whole ring) is contained in a maximal ideal.


The corresponding statement is not true in a number of other algebraic structure, primarily because the condition of being proper cannot be tested through the presence or absence of a single element. For instance, it is not in general true for modules over a fixed commutative ring, and it is not true in general for groups. The key difference in rings is that the presence or absence of a single element can be used to test for properness.


The proof uses the axiom of choice. We present here three slightly different formulations: transfinite induction, Zorn's lemma and the Hausdorff maximality principle.

Fill this in later