Ring equals max-localization intersection

From Commalg
Revision as of 16:34, 12 May 2008 by Vipul (talk | contribs) (1 revision)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Statement

Let be a commutative unital ring and its total quotient ring. For each maximal ideal of , let denote the localization of at viewed as a subring of . Then:

Proof

Let . Let be the ideal comprising those for which . is essentially the ideal of all possible denominators of fractions for in terms of elements of .

The claim is that . Suppose not. Then is a proper ideal of ,and since every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal, we can find a maximal ideal containing . But since , can be written as where . Clearly , and this contradicts .