One-dimensional Noetherian domain implies Cohen-Macaulay: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
(New page: {{curing property implication}} ==Statement== ===Property-theoretic statement=== The property of commutative unital rings of being a one-dimensional Noetherian domain is stronger...)
 
(No difference)

Revision as of 14:27, 11 March 2008

This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of an implication relation between two commutative unital ring properties. That is, it states that every commutative unital ring satisfying the first commutative unital ring property must also satisfy the second commutative unital ring property
View all commutative unital ring property implications | View all commutative unital ring property non-implications |Get help on looking up commutative unital ring property implications/non-implications
|

Statement

Property-theoretic statement

The property of commutative unital rings of being a one-dimensional Noetherian domain is stronger than the property of being a Cohen-Macaulay ring.

Verbal statement

Any one-dimensional domain (i.e. a Noetherian domain whose Krull dimension is exactly one) is Cohen-Macaulay.

Proof