Noether normalization theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Statement== | ==Statement== | ||
Let <math>k</math> be a [[field]] and <math>R</math> a finitely generated <math>k</math>-algebra | Let <math>k</math> be a [[field]] and <math>R</math> a finitely generated <math>k</math>-algebra. Then: | ||
* ''Weak version'': There exists a subring <math>S</math> of <math>R</math> such that <math>S \cong k[x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_r]</math> and <math>R</math> is a finitely generated <math>S</math>-module | |||
* ''Strong version'': Suppose <math>P_0 \le P_1 \le \ldots P_r</math> is an ascending chain of [[prime ideal]]s, such that no further prime ideals can be and <math>P_i \cap S = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_i)</math> Then we can choose <math>S</math> as above, with the further constraint that <math>P_i \cap S = (x_1,\ldots,x_i)</math>. | |||
==Applications== | ==Applications== | ||
* [[ | * [[weak nullstellensatz for arbitrary fields]] follows very directly from the weak version of the Noether normalization theorem. |
Revision as of 21:13, 2 February 2008
Statement
Let be a field and a finitely generated -algebra. Then:
- Weak version: There exists a subring of such that and is a finitely generated -module
- Strong version: Suppose is an ascending chain of prime ideals, such that no further prime ideals can be and Then we can choose as above, with the further constraint that .
Applications
- weak nullstellensatz for arbitrary fields follows very directly from the weak version of the Noether normalization theorem.