Noether normalization theorem: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Let <math>k</math> be a [[field]] and <math>R</math> a finitely generated <math>k</math>-algebra. Let <math>P_r \ge P_{r-1} \ge \ldots \ge P_0</math> be a chain of descending [[prime ideal]]s, maximal in the sense that no further prime ideals can be inserted in the chain. Then there exists a subring <math>S</math> of <math>R</math> with <math>S \cong k[x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_r]</math> sich that <math>R</math> is a finitely generated <math>S</math>-module and <math>P_i \cap S = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_i)</math>.
Let <math>k</math> be a [[field]] and <math>R</math> a finitely generated <math>k</math>-algebra. Then:
 
* ''Weak version'': There exists a subring <math>S</math> of <math>R</math> such that <math>S \cong k[x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_r]</math> and <math>R</math> is a finitely generated <math>S</math>-module
* ''Strong version'': Suppose <math>P_0 \le P_1 \le \ldots P_r</math> is an ascending chain of [[prime ideal]]s, such that no further prime ideals can be  and <math>P_i \cap S = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_i)</math> Then we can choose <math>S</math> as above, with the further constraint that <math>P_i \cap S = (x_1,\ldots,x_i)</math>.


==Applications==
==Applications==


* [[Hilbert's nullstellensatz]]
* [[weak nullstellensatz for arbitrary fields]] follows very directly from the weak version of the Noether normalization theorem.

Revision as of 21:13, 2 February 2008

Statement

Let k be a field and R a finitely generated k-algebra. Then:

  • Weak version: There exists a subring S of R such that Sk[x1,x2,,xr] and R is a finitely generated S-module
  • Strong version: Suppose P0P1Pr is an ascending chain of prime ideals, such that no further prime ideals can be and PiS=(x1,x2,,xi) Then we can choose S as above, with the further constraint that PiS=(x1,,xi).

Applications