Euclidean not implies norm-Euclidean: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
Line 15: Line 15:
==References==
==References==


* ''The Euclidean algorithm for Galois extensions of the rational numbers'' by David A. Clark
* ''The Euclidean algorithm in Galois extensions of <math>\mathbb{Q}</math>'' by David A. Clark and M. R. Murty
* ''A Quadratic Field which is Euclidean but not norm-Euclidean'' by David A. Clark, ''manuscripta math. 83, 327-330 (1994)''
* ''A Quadratic Field which is Euclidean but not norm-Euclidean'' by David A. Clark, ''manuscripta math. 83, 327-330 (1994)''

Revision as of 19:14, 5 January 2008

Statement

A ring of integers in a number field may be a Euclidean domain, even though it is not a norm-Euclidean domain. In other words, it may have a Euclidean norm which differs from its norm function, even if it is not Euclidean under its norm function.

Example

The ring:

is a Euclidean domain, but is not norm-Euclidean.

Proof (for example)

References

  • The Euclidean algorithm for Galois extensions of the rational numbers by David A. Clark
  • The Euclidean algorithm in Galois extensions of by David A. Clark and M. R. Murty
  • A Quadratic Field which is Euclidean but not norm-Euclidean by David A. Clark, manuscripta math. 83, 327-330 (1994)