Equivalence of definitions of Cohen-Macaulay ring: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision) |
m (Vipul moved page Equivalence of definitions of Cohen-Macaulay to Equivalence of definitions of Cohen-Macaulay ring) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 04:34, 18 July 2013
This article gives a proof/explanation of the equivalence of multiple definitions for the term Cohen-Macaulay ring
View a complete list of pages giving proofs of equivalence of definitions
The definitions that we have to prove as equivalent
The ring is assumed to be Noetherian.
- For every maximal ideal, the depth equals the codimension
- For every prime ideal, the depth equals the codimension
- For every ideal, the depth equals the codimension
Note that (3) implies (2) implies 1, so we need to show that (1) implies (3). In other words, we need to show that assuming depth = codimension for maximal ideals is enough to show that depth = codimension for all ideals.