Rabinowitch's trick: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
# <math>R</math> is a [[Jacobson ring]]
# <math>R</math> is a [[Jacobson ring]]
# If <math>P</math> is a [[prime ideal]] of <math>R</math> and if <math>S := R/P</math> contains an element <math>b \ne 0</math> such that <math>S[b^{-1}]</math> is a [[field]], then <math>S</math> is a field
# If <math>P</math> is a [[prime ideal]] of <math>R</math> and if <math>S := R/P</math> contains an element <math>b \ne 0</math> such that <math>S[b^{-1}]</math> is a [[field]], then <math>S</math> is a field
==Proof==
===1 implies 2===
As in the hypotheses, let <math>P</math> be a [[prime ideal]] in <math>R</math>. Then <math>S := R/P</math> is an [[integral domain]], and hence 0 is a prime ideal in this. Further, <math>S</math> is also a [[Jacobson ring]] since [[Jacobson is quotient-closed]], and thus the zero ideal in <math>S</math> is an [[intersection of maximal ideals]].
Now, the primes of <math>S[b^{-1}]</math> correspond to the primes of <math>S</math> that do not contain <math>b</math>. Since <math>S[b{-1}]</math> is a [[field]], <math>b</math> is contained in ''every'' nonzero prime ideal of <math>S</math>. Thus if <math>S</math> were ''not'' a [[field]], zero would not be a maximal ideal, and hence <math>b</math> would be contained in every [[maximal ideal]], contradicting the fact that the intersection of all maximal ideals is zero. Thus <math>S[b^{-1}]</math> is a field.
===2 implies 1===
{{fillin}}

Revision as of 01:06, 8 January 2008

Statement

Let be a commutative unital ring. The following are equivalent:

  1. is a Jacobson ring
  2. If is a prime ideal of and if contains an element such that is a field, then is a field

Proof

1 implies 2

As in the hypotheses, let be a prime ideal in . Then is an integral domain, and hence 0 is a prime ideal in this. Further, is also a Jacobson ring since Jacobson is quotient-closed, and thus the zero ideal in is an intersection of maximal ideals.

Now, the primes of correspond to the primes of that do not contain . Since is a field, is contained in every nonzero prime ideal of . Thus if were not a field, zero would not be a maximal ideal, and hence would be contained in every maximal ideal, contradicting the fact that the intersection of all maximal ideals is zero. Thus is a field.

2 implies 1

Fill this in later