PID not implies Euclidean: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The following ring is a principal ideal domain which is not Euclidean: | The following ring is a principal ideal domain which is not Euclidean: | ||
<math>\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1 + \sqrt{19}}{2}\right]</math> | <math>\mathbb{Z}\left[\frac{1 + \sqrt{-19}}{2}\right]</math> | ||
===Proof that it is a principal ideal domain=== | ===Proof that it is a principal ideal domain=== | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{fillin}} | {{fillin}} | ||
==References== | |||
* ''A Principal Ideal Ring that is not a Euclidean ring'' by Jack C. Wilson, ''Math. Mag., pp.34-38'' | |||
==External links== | |||
* [http://www.jstor.org/view/0025570x/di021078/02p0340n/0 JSTOR link for Wilson's note] | |||
Revision as of 18:58, 5 January 2008
This article gives the statement and possibly, proof, of a non-implication relation between two commutative unital ring properties. That is, it states that every commutative unital ring satisfying the first commutative unital ring property need not satisfy the second commutative unital ring property
View a complete list of commutative unital ring property non-implications | View a complete list of commutative unital ring property implications |Get help on looking up commutative unital ring property implications/non-implications
|
Statement
There exist principal ideal domains that are not Euclidean.
Proof
The following ring is a principal ideal domain which is not Euclidean:
Proof that it is a principal ideal domain
Fill this in later
Proof that it is not a Euclidean domain
Fill this in later
References
- A Principal Ideal Ring that is not a Euclidean ring by Jack C. Wilson, Math. Mag., pp.34-38