Ring equals max-localization intersection: Difference between revisions

From Commalg
No edit summary
 
m (1 revision)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 16:34, 12 May 2008

Statement

Let R be a commutative unital ring and K(R) its total quotient ring. For each maximal ideal M of R, let RM denote the localization of R at M viewed as a subring of K(R). Then:

R=RM

Proof

Let aRM. Let I be the ideal comprising those xR for which axR. I is essentially the ideal of all possible denominators of fractions for a in terms of elements of R.

The claim is that I=R. Suppose not. Then I is a proper ideal of R,and since every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal, we can find a maximal ideal M containing I. But since aRM, a can be written as p/q where qM. Clearly qI, and this contradicts IM.