<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://commalg.subwiki.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Euclideanness_is_quotient-closed</id>
	<title>Euclideanness is quotient-closed - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://commalg.subwiki.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Euclideanness_is_quotient-closed"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://commalg.subwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Euclideanness_is_quotient-closed&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-02T06:11:05Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://commalg.subwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Euclideanness_is_quotient-closed&amp;diff=1953&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Vipul: New page: {{curing metaproperty satisfaction| property = Euclidean ring| metaproperty = quotient-closed property of commutative unital rings}}  ==Statement==  Suppose &lt;math&gt;R&lt;/math&gt; is a [[commutati...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://commalg.subwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Euclideanness_is_quotient-closed&amp;diff=1953&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-02-05T16:39:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: {{curing metaproperty satisfaction| property = Euclidean ring| metaproperty = quotient-closed property of commutative unital rings}}  ==Statement==  Suppose &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a [[commutati...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{curing metaproperty satisfaction|&lt;br /&gt;
property = Euclidean ring|&lt;br /&gt;
metaproperty = quotient-closed property of commutative unital rings}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Statement==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a [[commutative unital ring]] that possesses a [[fact about::Euclidean norm]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Suppose &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an [[ideal]] inside &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Then, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R/I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a Euclidean ring, with norm given by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\overline{N}(x + I) = \min \{ N(x + r) \mid r \in I \}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, the norm of a coset is defined as the minimum of normso f all elements in the coset. (Note that this minimum is well-defined since it is the minimum over a nonempty subset of a well-ordered set.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related facts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Minimum over principal ideal of Euclidean norm is a smaller multiplicatively monotone Euclidean norm]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Euclideanness is localization-closed]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proof==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Given&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: A commutative unital ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with Euclidean norm &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. An ideal &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\overline{N}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is defined on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R/I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\overline{N}(x + I) = \min \{ N(x + r) \mid r \in I \}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;To prove&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\overline{N}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a Euclidean norm on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R/I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Proof&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: Suppose &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a + I, b + I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are two elements of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R/I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b + I \ne I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Now, there exists &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c \in a + I, d \in b + I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N(c) = \overline{N}(a)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N(d) = \overline{N}(b)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. By the Euclidean division in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c = dq + r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N(r) &amp;lt; N(d)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Going modulo &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c + I = (d + I)(q + I) + (r + I)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
which can be rewritten as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a + I = (b + I)(q + I) + (r + I)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r + I = I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N(r) &amp;lt; N(d)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Note that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\overline{N}(r + I) \le N(r)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by definition, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N(d) = \overline{N}(b + I)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by the choice of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Thus, we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r + I = I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\overline{N}(r + I) &amp;lt; \overline{N}(b + I)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which is precisely the condition for Euclidean division in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R/I&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Vipul</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>